TABATCHNICK vs CEDARLANE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CEDARLANE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
TABATCHNICK: 4
vs
CEDARLANE: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | TABATCHNICK | CEDARLANE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 28 cal | 122 cal | |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 6.4 g | |
| Carbs | 5.2 g | 14.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | TABATCHNICK | CEDARLANE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.3 MG | 28.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | TABATCHNICK | CEDARLANE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 112 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 52 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 235 MG | 272 MG |