SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING vs ORGANIC AGED BALSAMIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC AGED BALSAMIC DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING: 2
vs
ORGANIC AGED BALSAMIC DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | ORGANIC AGED BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 438 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 21.9 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | ORGANIC AGED BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET ITALIAN DRESSING | ORGANIC AGED BALSAMIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 812 MG | 417 MG |