SWEET CHILI SAUCE vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET CHILI SAUCE: 2
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET CHILI SAUCE | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 307 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET CHILI SAUCE | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 20 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET CHILI SAUCE | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 467 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 13.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,316 MG | 1,720 MG |