SWEET CHICKEN & APPLE SAUSAGE vs HATFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET CHICKEN & APPLE SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SWEET CHICKEN & APPLE SAUSAGE: 5
vs
HATFIELD: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET CHICKEN & APPLE SAUSAGE | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 12.9 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fat | 9.4 g | 30.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET CHICKEN & APPLE SAUSAGE | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET CHICKEN & APPLE SAUSAGE | HATFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 871 MG | 625 MG |