SWEET BAY SCALLOP vs CRUNCHY HOMESTYLE CALAMARI RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRUNCHY HOMESTYLE CALAMARI RINGS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SWEET BAY SCALLOP: 4
vs
CRUNCHY HOMESTYLE CALAMARI RINGS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET BAY SCALLOP | CRUNCHY HOMESTYLE CALAMARI RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 310 cal | 192 cal | |
| Protein | 9.9 g | 12.1 g | |
| Carbs | 14.1 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fat | 23.9 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET BAY SCALLOP | CRUNCHY HOMESTYLE CALAMARI RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET BAY SCALLOP | CRUNCHY HOMESTYLE CALAMARI RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 211 MG | 29 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 187 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 803 MG | 505 MG |