SWEET APPLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE vs PORK TASSO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET APPLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SWEET APPLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE: 6
vs
PORK TASSO: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SWEET APPLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE | PORK TASSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 232 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 14.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 10.3 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SWEET APPLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE | PORK TASSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SWEET APPLE PLANT-BASED SAUSAGE | PORK TASSO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 59 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 544 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 529 MG | 750 MG |