SUKI vs LOW FAT OATMILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LOW FAT OATMILK wins in 10 out of 15 nutrient categories
SUKI: 2
vs
LOW FAT OATMILK: 10
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SUKI | LOW FAT OATMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 38 cal | |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 1.3 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 1.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SUKI | LOW FAT OATMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0 UG | 0.5 UG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 2 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SUKI | LOW FAT OATMILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 146 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.1 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 112 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 162 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 31 MG | 42 MG |