SQUID TUBES vs WILD-CAUGHT KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
SQUID TUBES: 2
vs
WILD-CAUGHT KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SQUID TUBES | WILD-CAUGHT KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SQUID TUBES | WILD-CAUGHT KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SQUID TUBES | WILD-CAUGHT KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 62 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 265 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 44 MG | 119 MG |