SPAM CLASSIC vs SHUR SAVING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHUR SAVING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SPAM CLASSIC: 2
vs
SHUR SAVING: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SPAM CLASSIC | SHUR SAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 19.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SPAM CLASSIC | SHUR SAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SPAM CLASSIC | SHUR SAVING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 107 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,411 MG | 1,446 MG |