SOURDOUGH ROLLS vs WILD BLUEBERRY HOMESTYLE OATMEAL MUFFINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOURDOUGH ROLLS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SOURDOUGH ROLLS: 5
vs
WILD BLUEBERRY HOMESTYLE OATMEAL MUFFINS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOURDOUGH ROLLS | WILD BLUEBERRY HOMESTYLE OATMEAL MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 241 cal | 310 cal | |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 52.1 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 8.5 g | |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 4.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOURDOUGH ROLLS | WILD BLUEBERRY HOMESTYLE OATMEAL MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOURDOUGH ROLLS | WILD BLUEBERRY HOMESTYLE OATMEAL MUFFINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 28 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2 MG | 2.0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 444 MG | 296 MG |