SOLID WHITE - NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE TUNA IN SPRING WATER vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SOLID WHITE - NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE TUNA IN SPRING WATER: 3
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SOLID WHITE - NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE TUNA IN SPRING WATER | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 29.2 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SOLID WHITE - NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE TUNA IN SPRING WATER | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SOLID WHITE - NO SALT ADDED ALBACORE TUNA IN SPRING WATER | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 175 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 96 MG | 250 MG |