SMOKY COASTAL BLEND vs BAKEN-ETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKY COASTAL BLEND wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMOKY COASTAL BLEND: 5
vs
BAKEN-ETS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMOKY COASTAL BLEND | BAKEN-ETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 450 cal | 533 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 60 g | |
| Carbs | 57.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMOKY COASTAL BLEND | BAKEN-ETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMOKY COASTAL BLEND | BAKEN-ETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 150 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 325 MG | 2,533 MG |