SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK vs BUDDIG
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK: 4
vs
BUDDIG: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK | BUDDIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 118 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 23.5 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK | BUDDIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 8.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK | BUDDIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 643 MG | 541 MG |