SMITHFIELD vs KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SMITHFIELD: 2
vs
KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SMITHFIELD | KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 156 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 16.9 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 5.2 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 7.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SMITHFIELD | KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 19.5 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SMITHFIELD | KALE SKINLESS CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 26 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 714 MG |