SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM vs SLICED KOSHER BOLOGNA MADE WITH CHICKEN & BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM: 5
vs
SLICED KOSHER BOLOGNA MADE WITH CHICKEN & BEEF: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | SLICED KOSHER BOLOGNA MADE WITH CHICKEN & BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 109 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | SLICED KOSHER BOLOGNA MADE WITH CHICKEN & BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 26.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | SLICED KOSHER BOLOGNA MADE WITH CHICKEN & BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 356 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 982 MG |