SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM: 5
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 109 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 356 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 732 MG |