SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF vs UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF: 3
vs
UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.7 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | UNCURED BLACK FOREST HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 429 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 554 MG | 839 MG |