SLICED CHICKEN BOLOGNA vs SLOW COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED HAM wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
SLICED CHICKEN BOLOGNA: 2
vs
SLOW COOKED HAM: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SLICED CHICKEN BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 214 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SLICED CHICKEN BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 48.2 MG | 26.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SLICED CHICKEN BOLOGNA | SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 107 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 821 MG | 1,125 MG |