SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS vs COOKED SALAD SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SALAD SHRIMP wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS: 2
vs
COOKED SALAD SHRIMP: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | COOKED SALAD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 53 cal | 53 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 10.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | COOKED SALAD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | COOKED SALAD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 434 MG | 336 MG |