SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS vs NORTH PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NORTH PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS: 1
vs
NORTH PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | NORTH PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 88 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 18.6 g | 18.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.3 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | NORTH PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | NORTH PACIFIC WHITING FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 71 MG |