SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS vs SHRIMP BAO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS: 6
vs
SHRIMP BAO: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS | SHRIMP BAO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 5.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 34.1 g | |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS | SHRIMP BAO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 11 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON FILLETS | SHRIMP BAO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 367 MG | 71 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 75 MG | 424 MG |