SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 8
vs
COD FILLET: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 95 cal | 153 cal | |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 8.2 g | |
| Carbs | 1.4 g | 12.2 g | |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 73 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 297 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 392 MG | 296 MG |