SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT MAHI MAHI FILLETS vs WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT MAHI MAHI FILLETS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT MAHI MAHI FILLETS: 5
vs
WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT MAHI MAHI FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 89 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 23.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT MAHI MAHI FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 2 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT MAHI MAHI FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT TUNA STEAKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 420 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 89 MG | 35 MG |