SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK vs WHITE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHITE SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK: 3
vs
WHITE SHRIMP: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS WILD CAUGHT HADDOCK | WHITE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 212 MG | 200 MG |