SKINLESS vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS: 5
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 119 cal | |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 22.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 31 MG | 95 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 282 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 964 MG |