SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON vs MACKEREL IN BRINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL IN BRINE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON: 3
vs
MACKEREL IN BRINE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON | MACKEREL IN BRINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 41.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 10.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON | MACKEREL IN BRINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK WILD SALMON | MACKEREL IN BRINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 446 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 247 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 282 MG | 679 MG |