SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER vs CHOPPED SEA CLAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER: 4
vs
CHOPPED SEA CLAMS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 190 cal | 56 cal | |
| Protein | 22.2 g | 9.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.6 g | 3.7 g | |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON IN WATER | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 563 MG | 463 MG |