SKINLESS & BONELESS GRILLED MACKEREL IN 100% OLIVE OIL vs WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS & BONELESS GRILLED MACKEREL IN 100% OLIVE OIL wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS GRILLED MACKEREL IN 100% OLIVE OIL: 7
vs
WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS GRILLED MACKEREL IN 100% OLIVE OIL | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 19.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 7.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS GRILLED MACKEREL IN 100% OLIVE OIL | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 7 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS GRILLED MACKEREL IN 100% OLIVE OIL | WILD ALASKA PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 176 MG | 159 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 124 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 541 MG | 429 MG |