SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN IN WATER PINK SALMON vs CHOPPED SEA CLAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED SEA CLAMS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN IN WATER PINK SALMON: 4
vs
CHOPPED SEA CLAMS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN IN WATER PINK SALMON | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 37 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.9 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN IN WATER PINK SALMON | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 14 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS & BONELESS ALASKAN IN WATER PINK SALMON | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 111 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 124 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 212 MG | 278 MG |