SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs SALMON IN BRINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 6
vs
SALMON IN BRINE: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON | SALMON IN BRINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 136 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 18 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 7.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON | SALMON IN BRINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON | SALMON IN BRINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 17 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 311 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 257 MG | 442 MG |