SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs ATLANTIC COD FILLETTS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 6
vs
ATLANTIC COD FILLETTS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON | ATLANTIC COD FILLETTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 0 cal | 82 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 18 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON | ATLANTIC COD FILLETTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS AND BONELESS WILD-CAUGHT PINK SALMON | ATLANTIC COD FILLETTS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 17 MG | 10 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 311 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 257 MG | 54 MG |