SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS vs LARGE COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS: 1
vs
LARGE COOKED SHRIMP: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 15.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 5 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS | LARGE COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 48 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 405 MG |