SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS vs BOURBON SOCKEYE SALMON WILD CAUGHT CEDAR PLANK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BOURBON SOCKEYE SALMON WILD CAUGHT CEDAR PLANK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS: 4
vs
BOURBON SOCKEYE SALMON WILD CAUGHT CEDAR PLANK: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS | BOURBON SOCKEYE SALMON WILD CAUGHT CEDAR PLANK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 cal | 201 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 17.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fat | 5 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS | BOURBON SOCKEYE SALMON WILD CAUGHT CEDAR PLANK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKINLESS AND BONELESS TILAPIA FILLETS | BOURBON SOCKEYE SALMON WILD CAUGHT CEDAR PLANK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 542 MG |