SKIN ON PACIFIC SALMON FILLET vs COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIN ON PACIFIC SALMON FILLET wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKIN ON PACIFIC SALMON FILLET: 4
vs
COOKED SHRIMP: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKIN ON PACIFIC SALMON FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 80 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKIN ON PACIFIC SALMON FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKIN ON PACIFIC SALMON FILLET | COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 159 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 239 MG | 224 MG |