SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS vs RTG WH GS TILAPIA 8340562
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS: 5
vs
RTG WH GS TILAPIA 8340562: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | RTG WH GS TILAPIA 8340562 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 25.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | RTG WH GS TILAPIA 8340562 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | RTG WH GS TILAPIA 8340562 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 429 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 49 MG | 35 MG |