SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS vs 8/16 IQF H&G CROAKER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
8/16 IQF H&G CROAKER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS: 3
vs
8/16 IQF H&G CROAKER: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | 8/16 IQF H&G CROAKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 3.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | 8/16 IQF H&G CROAKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SKIN ON CHUM SALMON PORTS | 8/16 IQF H&G CROAKER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 15 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 429 MG | 348 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 49 MG | 58 MG |