SHELL & TAIL ON vs WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SHELL & TAIL ON wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SHELL & TAIL ON: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SHELL & TAIL ON | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 91 cal | 56 cal | |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SHELL & TAIL ON | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SHELL & TAIL ON | WILD CAUGHT ALASKA POLLOCK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 55 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 200 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 218 MG | 336 MG |