SEATTLE SOURDOUGH BAKING COMPANY vs STONE & SKILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SEATTLE SOURDOUGH BAKING COMPANY wins in 7 out of 14 nutrient categories
SEATTLE SOURDOUGH BAKING COMPANY: 7
vs
STONE & SKILLET: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEATTLE SOURDOUGH BAKING COMPANY | STONE & SKILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 224 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 37.8 g | 47.1 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEATTLE SOURDOUGH BAKING COMPANY | STONE & SKILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, total | 89 UG | 0 UG | |
| Niacin | 4.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Riboflavin | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Thiamin | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEATTLE SOURDOUGH BAKING COMPANY | STONE & SKILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 178 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 622 MG | 541 MG |