SEA SALT CRISPY MUSHROOM SNACK vs TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
SEA SALT CRISPY MUSHROOM SNACK: 4
vs
TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEA SALT CRISPY MUSHROOM SNACK | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 567 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 43.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 40 g | 35.7 g | |
| Fiber | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEA SALT CRISPY MUSHROOM SNACK | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEA SALT CRISPY MUSHROOM SNACK | TRADITIONAL FRIED PORK SKINS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 10 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 1,147 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 667 MG | 2,214 MG |