SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR vs RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR: 1
vs
RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR | RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR | RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SEA BASS WGS 250/350 GR | RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 256 MG | 478 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 223 MG | 53 MG |