SCHARFFEN BERGER vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHARFFEN BERGER wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SCHARFFEN BERGER: 6
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCHARFFEN BERGER | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 512 cal | 465 cal | |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 46.5 g | 65.1 g | |
| Fat | 34.9 g | 20.9 g | |
| Fiber | 7 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCHARFFEN BERGER | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCHARFFEN BERGER | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 233 MG | 130 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 251 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 105 MG | 70 MG |