SCHALLER & WEBER vs BLACK ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SCHALLER & WEBER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SCHALLER & WEBER: 4
vs
BLACK ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SCHALLER & WEBER | BLACK ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 304 cal | |
| Protein | 19.6 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 25 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SCHALLER & WEBER | BLACK ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SCHALLER & WEBER | BLACK ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 500 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,393 MG | 821 MG |