S&B vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
S&B: 2
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | S&B | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 455 cal | 307 cal | |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 9.1 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 45.5 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 20 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | S&B | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 20 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | S&B | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 45 MG | 467 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 13.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 3,682 MG | 1,720 MG |