SAMU vs COCONUT WATER WITH PULP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SAMU wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
SAMU: 4
vs
COCONUT WATER WITH PULP: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SAMU | COCONUT WATER WITH PULP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 23 cal | 948 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 5.8 g | 206.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 8.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SAMU | COCONUT WATER WITH PULP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | SAMU | COCONUT WATER WITH PULP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 345 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 161 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 32 MG | 991 MG |