SALMON vs WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
SALMON: 4
vs
WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | SALMON | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 193 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 19.2 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 11.4 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | SALMON | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | SALMON | WILD-CAUGHT LING COD FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 314 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 550 MG | 132 MG |