ROTISSERIE-SEASONED CHICKEN vs MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROTISSERIE-SEASONED CHICKEN wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ROTISSERIE-SEASONED CHICKEN: 5
vs
MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ROTISSERIE-SEASONED CHICKEN | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 202 cal | 91 cal | |
| Protein | 20.2 g | 9.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 6.1 g | |
| Fat | 11.9 g | 3.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ROTISSERIE-SEASONED CHICKEN | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ROTISSERIE-SEASONED CHICKEN | MILD SEASONED CHICKEN AL PASTOR WITH PINEAPPLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 258 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 607 MG | 273 MG |