ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR HALF SUB vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR HALF SUB wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR HALF SUB: 7
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR HALF SUB | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 16.9 g | 10.8 g | |
| Carbs | 18.8 g | 21.1 g | |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 11.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 2.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR HALF SUB | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.5 MG | 2.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ROAST BEEF & CHEDDAR HALF SUB | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 157 MG | 28 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.1 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 588 MG | 427 MG |