RIGGED BALLYHOO vs 2/3 OZ FLOUNDER FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
2/3 OZ FLOUNDER FILLET wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
RIGGED BALLYHOO: 3
vs
2/3 OZ FLOUNDER FILLET: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RIGGED BALLYHOO | 2/3 OZ FLOUNDER FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 19.5 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RIGGED BALLYHOO | 2/3 OZ FLOUNDER FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RIGGED BALLYHOO | 2/3 OZ FLOUNDER FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 46 MG | 23 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 161 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 189 MG | 295 MG |