RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE vs GREAT LAKES CHEESE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GREAT LAKES CHEESE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE: 2
vs
GREAT LAKES CHEESE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | GREAT LAKES CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 145 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | GREAT LAKES CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICOTTA PART SKIM CHEESE | GREAT LAKES CHEESE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 161 MG | 286 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 242 MG | 1,393 MG |