RICKLAND ORCHARDS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 9 out of 10 nutrient categories
RICKLAND ORCHARDS: 0
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 9
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | RICKLAND ORCHARDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 525 cal | 465 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 34.9 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 32.6 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 25.6 g | |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 18.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | RICKLAND ORCHARDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | RICKLAND ORCHARDS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 50 MG | 140 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 12 MG | 163 MG |